Archive for the ‘movie’ Category


I had to make sure of what the date was before I posted this. Back on April 1, it was reported the Netflix was getting new episodes of Firefly; I got punked for a bit. Now, the reports for a Farscape movie was months ago which I kept in the back of my head as to not to get too excited over the prospects. Reading this morning news, I could not be pleased by the news and the process of a new Farscape movie is in the works. However, after reading the article below, I was kinda dumbstruck by the “premise” of this new film. I will be talking about this in the next podcast and would like to hear your thoughts on this matter. Are you happy with a new Farscape movie? Do you wish for another Farscape series? Or should Farscape receive a rebooted treatment? Let me know on this blog and your comments might show up on the podcast.

Back in February we brought you news that a Farscape movie was supposedly in the works. Now Rockne O’Bannon, creator and showrunner of the original series, has confirmed that the movie is, in fact, happening.

Confirmation comes by way of TV.com:

Just a little bit of, maybe interesting, information to report. ;-p Texting me from WonderCon, a very good friend of mine (@PaulBurrows) just left the Showrunners Panel at [WonderCon]. A panel member, non other than Rockne O’Bannon, the co-creator ofWarehouse 13, Defiance, and Revolution… who was also Farscape’s creator and showrunner – has indeed CONFIRMED a Farscape movie is happening.

via The Farscape Movie is Officially Happening.


noah-poster

On one of the rare times that I go to the movies, an even rarer times going to the movies with my wife, we decided to see Noah. I can honestly say my wife like this movie more than I did. For me, it was not so much the artistic license with the story, though this seemed I was watching a fantasy movie a la Lord of the Rings, Mad Max or some alternative Earth story. My problem lies within the context of this bible story. Since I don’t follow a religion, though I observe religious holidays, I am not a religious person. I get the idea of faith and that there is something greater than us that made the world that we live in today. How do we know all this went down the way that it did?

I know everything is up to interpretation in the bible and not as gospel of truth. We have Adam and Eve who had two sons. Cain killed Abel and Adam and Eve then had another son called Seth. So, out of the four, we give credit to them for the birth of civilization? Flash forward to Noah and the flood. Carrying out God’s will to protect the innocent – the animals, Noah believed that after his family died, there would be no more men on Earth. Yet, the barren Ila (Emma Watson) is given the ability to have children and as so upset Noah’s plan. Since the babies were girls, Noah planned to kill them as to not have any more off-springs. When the time came, Noah was unable to commit murder of his two new granddaughters. By the end of the movie, he is telling the same thing that “God” said about being fruitful and multiply. With that said, we have Noah and his wife, his oldest son with Ila and their two daughters, and then Noah’s youngest son. Noah’s middle left the family due to conflicts with his father which were very valid but are we to believe that this small handful of survivors had enough genetic material to populate the Earth? There had to be incest on some level to procreate, right? So my wife is really my sister and Noah is my father, NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! That’s impossible and no, I will not search out my feelings because I know this to be false.

For all the good the movie tried to give you a story that might have happened a long, long time ago, I for one was taken out of the movie by logic. Later in the day, I was watching Cosmos on Fox which blew me away on the origins of the Universe. Having experienced these polar opposites, there is room for both in my life. I am not about to get into the details here because I am getting physically worked up on this issue. I will try to make mention of it on my podcast which has been long overdue.


DougI love it science catches up to futuristic ideas as seen in popular science fiction books and movies. Now personally, I do like the idea of being able to understand a dog through a translation device rather than being able to speak to fish ala Aquaman. 1) I don’t like the idea of talking to an animal where I might eat it later on and 2) Squirrel…..

What if your dog could greet you with more than a growl, or announce the reason he’s scratching at the door? It sounds absurd and much like the storyline from the Pixar film, “Up,” but Scandinavian scientists are working to develop a headset that could soon allow your furry best friend to speak his mind. The Nordic Society for Invention and Discovery is the brains behind “No More Woof” — technology that aims to distinguish canine thought patterns and then issue them as short sentences via a microphone. “The brainwaves differ quite a lot from different races as well as individual dogs,” NSID writes on their website. “However it is possible to detect some common patterns and we have no doubt that in the future this technology will open up a vast new era of communication between dogs and humans, or animals in general and humans.”

via Talking Dog Device Ready to Hit Market Soon – Yahoo.


adam-driver-star-wars-2

And you are??? Any relations to Minnie Driver? Taxi Driver? Pile Driver? Ok, even of this crap. Now, could this be a good this to have an unknown actor, at least to me anyway, to play a villain role in the new Star Wars movie? Sure, there were many relatively unknown actors to play the heroes in Episode 4 like Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford who had many smaller roles in Coppola’s movie. The two more established actors were Alec Guiness and Peter Cushing helped to round out the cast. Now for the new movie, the unknowns will be the stars of the movie and unknown, Adam Driver, to play the villain. My two cents, now worth less than that, is this character going to have a long lasting screen presence like Darth Vader as the article suggests below or will he be done in by the end of the new movie ala Darth Maul? (yes, I know Maul lives on in the comics and in the animated clone wars but no one cares.) I for one loved seeing Maul but they hype and the limited amount of screen time made this a less than impressive character let alone a villain. I can’t say that Adam will be doing Admiral Thrawn from the Zahn series but the cannon after Return, made clear by Disney, will not matter.

Any thoughts on this matter?

Adam Driver is ready to travel to a galaxy far, far, away.Sources tell Variety that while no deal is done yet, the “Girls” actor is close to signing on to play the villain in J.J. Abrams’ “Star Wars: Episode VII.” Exact details are unknown, but the character is said to be in the vein of iconic “Star Wars” villain Darth Vader.Driver, 30, is the first cast member to be revealed for Walt Disney Studios and LucasFilm’s highly-anticipated “Star Wars” installment, which will open in theaters on Dec. 18, 2015.The big-budget tentpole, directed by J.J. Abrams, is scheduled to shoot at London’s Pinewood Studios in April. Additional cast members will likely be announced in the next month.“Star Wars: Episode VII” will continue the Jedi saga where “Return of the Jedi” left off.

via ‘Star Wars’ Adam Driver: ‘Girls’ Actor in Talks to Play the Villain | Variety.


the_lego_movie_2014This will be a very short review. Trust me when I say, “Everything is Awesome!!!” By writing any more and to include a spoiler alert would not be fair to you. Trust me when I say, I was completely blown away and so will you. Go watch it now.


jesse-eisenberg-2

This has been one hell of a week for reveals in the land of geekdom. We have the new Dr. Who Peter Capaldi sporting out his new dudes –  SPOILERS – no bow tie. The new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie by Michael Bay has had several leaked pictures of favorite heroes. Even the new animated Star War ‘Rebel’ series introduces us to a new droid called Choppers. Still for my money, this latest bit of new about Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor in the upcoming Superman/Batman will have people talking for days. (ok not people but just us NERDS!!!)

To begin with, Jesse Eisenberg is a fine actor and has several great films under his belt like Zombieland and The Social Network. My only concern with Jesse as I see him as this smart kid with a hoodie as seen above. Granted, we did get a young version of Luthor in the Smallville series with Michael Rosenbaum. But I for one, don’t want to see a similar take of this villain on the big screen. As I posted on my Facebook page for this site, it is getting hard to keep the faith that this is somehow all going to work. Perhaps, we are living in an age where we put too much expectation or give our knee reaction to the littlest bit of news. Still, it feels a bit clunky.

I don’t know what else to say except as a fan and a DC Comics (doesn’t DC stand for Detective Comic? and when we say DC Comics are we really saying Detective Comics Comics?) and I want my Justice League movie just like The Avengers. Sadly, we’ll get it but I maybe not the way I would like.

Warner Bros. Pictures has cast Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor and Jeremy Irons will play Alfred in the upcoming Superman/Batman film.

The castings, announced Friday, come two weeks after Warner pushed production on the untitled “Superman-Batman” movie to the second quarter of this year and set a release date of May 6, 2016 as the studio departed from a July, 2015 slot.

The film is in pre-production with Henry Cavill as Superman and Ben Affleck as Batman and Zack Snyder directing.

‘Batman-Superman” will also reunite “Man of Steel” stars Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne and Diane Lane, and also stars Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman/Diana Prince.

The screenplay will be written by David S. Goyer, from a story co-created by Goyer and Snyder. Charles Roven and Deborah Snyder are producing, with Benjamin Melniker, Michael E. Uslan and Wesley Coller serving as exec producers.

via Jesse Eisenberg Cast As Lex Luthor in ‘Superman/Batman,’ Jeremy Irons Set as Alfred | Variety.


gentlemen broncos

Benjamin (Michael Angarano), home—schooled by his eccentric mother (Jennifer Coolidge), is a loveable loner whose passion for writing leads him on an offbeat and hilarious journey as his story first gets ripped off by the legendary fantasy novelist, Ronald Chevalier (Jemaine Clement) and then is adapted into a disastrous movie by the small town’s most prolific homespun filmmaker.

via Fox Searchlight

I’ve wanted to see this movie for some time. For one reason or another, I forget to request this movie from my library. When I see this trailer on a dvd, I have a laughing fit which leads me to say, “I have to rent this.” This last time, I didn’t forget and I am so glad for it. This third outing for Jared Hess has the same off the wall goofiness as Napoleon Dynamite and Nacho Libre. What pushes the movie over the top is the scene stealing Sam Rockwell. Playing the lead ficticous character Bronco as written by Benjamin (Michael Angarano) and then rewritten as Brutus by Chevalier (Jemaine Clement), Sam makes both version of the same character absolutely hysterical to watch. He plays both parts with so much fun that I could not wait to see him on the screen again. This is not to the rest of the film was bad it just that Sam was that good that, in my opinion, stole the movie. I loved watching Sam in Moon and his role as Zaphod Breeblebrox in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Sam is indeed the man

Check out this dvd. Long live Yeast Lords!!!

bronco

 


Jar Jar is the key to all this.” George Lucas

If you remember watching this ad for Sprite, then you’ll understand the crux of this article.

Yes, businesses are in the business to make money and there is no disputing the brand value of Star Wars. But Disney, just chill and relax. I’ll be there with my family and friends waiting on long lines to give you my money; I have no problems with that. So please rest assured that when that movie comes out, you get what you paid for and then some. However, please don’t think for a moment that creating this Phantom Menace deadline of May 2015 is going to make for a better product. If you rush this and give us crap, you will get what you paid for and that will be not my money.

Over the week, I was surprised to learn to hear J.J. Abrams and Lawrence Kasdan to take over the scriptwriting duties from Michael Arndt. Not that this isn’t great news of itself but the timetable to get this written, re-written and go to film, edit and get out by May 2015, in my opinion, is unworkable. I want my next Star Wars movie experience to have the same impact on my kids as it did with me back in 1977. Though this may not be possible seen they have just about seen all the movies, still the hope is there to have a wonderful experience. I want to leave the movie theater flying high and not doing a facepalm saying, “Why did they bring back Jar Jar?” Do it right, Disney, do it right.

On pretty much the one-year anniversary of the day Disney bought Lucasfilm for $4 billion, we’re getting confirmation via The Hollywood Reporter of some of the behind-the-scenes struggles that have been rumored regarding the next Star Wars film. The short version is that the creative minds behind the film (producer Kathleen Kennedy, and to a lesser extent director J.J. Abrams) preferring to push the film into summer 2016 while Disney CEO Bob Iger remains firm that the film come out for summer 2015. But at what cost?

This is an almost comically stereotypical battle between art and commerce, with the “artists” wanting the most time possible to make the best film possible while the business overlords want something to release over summer 2015 (presumably the mid-May weekend before Memorial Day weekend) damn the long term consequences. Abrams is said to be more on board with the firm 2015, with allegations of him taking more control over the process, but I’d frankly argue that he knows that he will be the one to take the fall should this new Stars Wars film prove an artistic disappointment.

via Will Disney Sacrifice ‘Star Wars’ Films For ‘Star Wars’ Toys? – Forbes.


robertorci_big

Star Trek Into Darkness is still a thorny issue after all these months. As the article goes on, the minority of those who saw this movie were not pleased were a great deal of Star Trek fans. Just because the majority of the people who saw Into Darkness gave it high marks doesn’t make this Trek movie the best of the bunch. I’ve been wanting and still plan on doing a Trek podcast because this is a very sore subject and I need to purge all this negativity to move on. Yes, I can hold a grudge on many things but I want to have some closure to move on this issue very soon.

I had shown the movie on dvd to my wife and kids and for the most part, they liked the movie. My son, 7, thought the movie was cool while my daughter, 12, liked the movie because of Benedict and that she loves him as Sherlock Holmes. My wife, who is a huge Trek fan, told me that the movie was forgivable except certain moments which were unforgivable as this movie treaded on certain iconic Trek movie moments and treated them poorly. As you can see, using this example, my family overall liked the movie like the general public but like the minority, Trek fans like my wife still had a problem with this second movie from J.J. Abrams.

Star Trek has had plenty of horrific episodes and movies that make me cringe thinking about or shall be named. This happens regardless of any tv series or movie. Still, I think I am more upset with Into Darkness because the bar was set so high with the reboot in 2009 lens flares in all. Trek fans were short-changed and refused to accept this movies as a quality Trek movie. If you are reading this and still don’t get it, you’re probably not a Star Trek fan.

Star Trek Into Darkness is a weird movie. The sequel wasn’t a summer smash, but audiences and critics were fans. The movie received an 87% on Rottentomatoes, a high cinemascore, and a respectable box-office take. But, if you ask plenty Trek fans, it’s no critical darling. The movie was recently named the worst Trek film at a Trek convention, and while I’m not exactly a fan of Into Darkness, to claim it’s at the bottom of the Trek barrel is flat out silliness.

via Moviepilot Exclusive Interview: Bob Orci Reflects On ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ | Moviepilot: New Stories for Upcoming Movies.


I’ve wanted to write about James Bond for a while. A few weeks ago, the internet was blessed with the release of Adele’s Skyfall for the new James Bond. Before I knew Adele was attached to the theme song, there was song called “Rumor Has It,” she did from her 21 album. When I listened to it, I knew she had great potential for a Bond song ala Shirley Bassey (and that’s a tough act to follow). At the 2:21 mark of Rumor Has It, the music and tempo switches to a slower beat and then she utters the line, “All these words whispered…”, this harkened me the days of Carly Simon and her song “Nobody Does it Better,” from The Spy Who Loved Me. And then, oddly enough Adele gets her own James Bond song.

After watching the video several times, I’m okay with it and I was glad to hear the little James Bond theme riff in the music. Having said this, the last two Bond songs, “You Know My Name,” by Chris Cornell and “Another Way to Die” By Alicia Keys and Jack White where interesting to listen to but for some reason, when a James Bond song does not include the name of the movie in the song itself, I’m somewhat missing it. Hell, A-ha managed to sing The Living Daylights in their song and in A-ha fashion made this one of my all time favorites. Now, I’m not saying that this trend has to continue but I just feel that there’s a stronger connection between the song and movie which binds them both good and bad.

Going back to Adele, the opening line is, “This is the end,” which I’m hoping is code for Daniel Craig‘s last outing as James Bond. If you have read my blog before on this subject, you’ll know my dislike for Craig’s Bond. For some unknown reason both Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace justified another Bond movie with Craig. While I was sad to see Pierce Brosnan no longer with the Bond franchise, I was very happy with the replacement after I saw Layer Cake. If you have not seen it, I highly recommend it as I saw Daniel Craig as James Bond which I thought I would see in the movies when Daniel took over. For example, just like when I saw the original The Saint, (not the Val Kilmer crap) with Roger Moore I could see the 007 role. There wasn’t much of a change with Moore from The Saint to James Bond. An yet, Daniel performance was totally lackluster from Layer Cake to Casino Royale. Except for one or two scenes of action, which I admit were great, I enjoyed him more getting hit in the balls in Quantum of Solace. Payback sucks, Craig. Where’s my Bond?!? Skyfall on the surface appears to be another slick bond production and I am willing to see it in the theaters but if this fails to deliver to my expectations, I will start a campaign to get rid of Craig as Bond. I am all for different actors to bring something unique and new to the role but Craig has gone through the motion and not delivered the goods.